All ideas

I think locking past months once they are completed on the planner is a good idea, as it would prevent employees from going back and deleting or editing vacation days. This would help ensure the accuracy of the records in the future. Unless you do...

Currently there is only the option to add one attachment to an Email template. It is good practice to send specific documents separately so they can be referenced clearly in communication to applicants.

Allow employees to keep the HR function up to date with critical information

We have set up a new office in another country and would like our head of HR there to have full admin rights to that location without them having full admin rights and visability to head office. As an example - Even with edit access rights, they a...

In the new performance management tool - you can only rate performance on a scale of 1-5, but organisations may use a 1-3 or 1-4 or 1-5 point rating scale. The ability to select the scale is required for this module to be useful.

Would be helpful to see the employee's holiday requests and then when they cancelled the request, especially if it has been cancelled while still in a 'pending' authorisation and no email sent. This would assist with understanding the possibility ...

All colleagues have bank holiday allowance included in their holiday balance, lots have asked about whether the Bank holidays can show on the planner dashboard separetly like to TOIL as they are getting confused about the amount of holiday that's ...

When setting pulse surveys in advance, the survey can select all staff. This then doesn't dynamically select employees as and when the numbers changes for starters and leavers - all staff should accomodate this.

Currently the only way to know if a comment has been added by a reviewer or a candidate has been moved along the pathway is to go in and look. This either means forgetting to do it or doing it a lot with no activity, or asking the individual to te...

When marking leavers, admins are forced to add supporting comments in when staff are 're-employable' but are not forced when staff are 'not re-employable'. Surely this should be the other way round. Admins are wasting a lot of time adding comments...