My subscriptions

Add the ability to query on an end / start date without entering the specific dates manually. This will improve queries but also will allow better ripples (send an email 3 days before end of planned absence, for example). Currently querying on sta...

Currently there is only the option to add one attachment to an Email template. It is good practice to send specific documents separately so they can be referenced clearly in communication to applicants.

I think locking past months once they are completed on the planner is a good idea, as it would prevent employees from going back and deleting or editing vacation days. This would help ensure the accuracy of the records in the future. Unless you do...

Allow employees to keep the HR function up to date with critical information

We have set up a new office in another country and would like our head of HR there to have full admin rights to that location without them having full admin rights and visability to head office. As an example - Even with edit access rights, they a...

Would be helpful to see the employee's holiday requests and then when they cancelled the request, especially if it has been cancelled while still in a 'pending' authorisation and no email sent. This would assist with understanding the possibility ...

It would be helpful when an employee logs out of the system instead of directing them to a marketing page for a new tool to have a link in order to log back into the system.

For every person added to the Software, they are assigned either Admin or Employee. I am therefore classifying some EU staff as Employees when they are not, for example: Their record shows they are an employee, but in Poland, they are a Civil Work...

In the new performance management tool - you can only rate performance on a scale of 1-5, but organisations may use a 1-3 or 1-4 or 1-5 point rating scale. The ability to select the scale is required for this module to be useful.

When marking leavers, admins are forced to add supporting comments in when staff are 're-employable' but are not forced when staff are 'not re-employable'. Surely this should be the other way round. Admins are wasting a lot of time adding comments...