All ideas

We have set up a new office in another country and would like our head of HR there to have full admin rights to that location without them having full admin rights and visability to head office. As an example - Even with edit access rights, they a...

Is there a way to report on the sickness % that you can see on the employees planner top of screen with queries. We can't seem to find where this outputs to so we can report on Sickness Absence rather than having to take this and complete calculat...

Currently organisational charts disclose information regarding employee's length of service. This data may relate to employee tenure, position, benefits, or salary within the organisation. It pertains to an individual's employment history, and rev...

Staff would like to be able to view their +/- hours for the day/week/month easily on their People HR planner so that they can keep track of their hours and any TOIL due. We have a number of project workers whose hours fluctuate and they are findin...

Integration with job sites such as CV Library, Total Jobs, Job Rapido, Monster etc would be useful.

We have two different work patterns for many of our employees, one used in the summer and one used in the winter, and have to switch those patterns twice a year. It would be very useful to be able to find all employees by their current work patter...

For admin staff - so they can ensure that sick leave process has been completed correctly and has been approved by HR.

In the new performance management tool - you can only rate performance on a scale of 1-5, but organisations may use a 1-3 or 1-4 or 1-5 point rating scale. The ability to select the scale is required for this module to be useful.

When looking at employee planner, the flag option only shows instances of leave rather than be a designator for each day of leave, which is a strange design choice. There should at least be a designator for each day of leave shown in the planner a...

When marking leavers, admins are forced to add supporting comments in when staff are 're-employable' but are not forced when staff are 'not re-employable'. Surely this should be the other way round. Admins are wasting a lot of time adding comments...