On the performance tab, once someone completes a review and closes it off the goals are nowehere else to be found apart from them selecting 'previous' reviews and updating that. Goals are supposed to be live all year round form appraisal to apprai...
Employees should be able to be added or removed from a review once it's live - there is a tick box which says 'Select this option if this is an on-going performance review that you would like to assign on a case-by-case basis' but it doesn't allow...
Move the overview section to the end of an appraisal, instead of being the first tab.
Our employees find it confusing why the overview of the performance appraisal is at the start. This would make more sense to move to the end so both employees and managers can reflect on the overall performance.
Performance Reviews - Allow Admin to better tailor this to fit into the organisation
Over half our employees are factory/warehouse based with limited IT access. We wish to explore a way to make this more Manager oriented in terms of completing it themselves. i.e. removing the employee input section where required. We wish to decid...
If an admin were to make a performance review form live for users to complete and a user were to make a mistake and accidentally submit it, there is currently no way for it to be reopened by an admin, user, line manager or development
Performance review to be open to editing after being rolled out
If someone is accidentally missed off the filtering system, you then have to make a completely new review and change the title. Ability to add people after rolling out, as well as being able to alter wording to fix mistakes would be beneficial.
Hi - we think it is odd only the employee can add a rating on Evo Employee Performance. The manager has the ultimate decision on this. If this is not changed by year end, we will need to create a logbook for manager rating which is not idea. thanks
Could the Performance Review section be seriously overhauled? Most organisations are now using a continuous review method rather than the static, once-a-year look back. The current system does not support continuous review and has many problems an...